Religion is quite possibly the most powerful social construct in the world today. No other social construct has managed to kill as many people (and animals) nor save as many lives as religion has. No other social construct is primarily responsible for as many wars or as many charities as religion. Religion itself is responsible for such incredible good in this world and yet is the root cause of so much bad.
For all its good I am no fan of religion. The bad is just too great to ignore for me. Now don’t get me wrong. I encourage faith in whatever you believe. But lets not confuse faith with religion. There is a distinct difference: faith refers mainly to a blindly, loyal belief in something that you cannot quite prove. Religion is the doctrine that surrounds faith that insists that its followers not only have some truth that everyone else does not, but also demands that all other faith is wrong. There is no room for tolerance in MOST religions (some religions do seem to promote some modicum of tolerance, but they are few and far in between).
That is the major problem with religion. Religion and tolerance cannot truly exist together. Oh… religious people will often act like they are tolerant of others but they are in fact only acting. Their intolerance still exists. They still believe that belief in their faith will result in reward and that rejection of their faith will result in punishment.
As much as I am against most forms of organized religion I also realize that religion is necessary. You see, it is faith that keeps this world from falling into darkness. Faith in leading a good life, or faith in higher virtues, or even the atheists faith (what? Atheists have faith too… just not in God) in social morality and in doing good so that good can be done to you. The faith of many of the worlds religions have one thing in common: love your fellow man. Faith understands that it cannot survive without followers and that it must, for the most part, protect its followers. And to that end most faiths will promote loving and caring for your fellow man. But religion has no such understanding… religion seeks to separate and divide people by the god they worship or the god they don’t and then gradually to consume each division into the other until there is only one religion left. But to this end religion performs a very important role: religion is the vehicle that spreads faith throughout the world. If a religion spreads a faith that encourages loving your brother and caring for others and respect and freedom and benevolence then I can tolerate it. Truly tolerate it.
To me, it matters not that you worship Jesus, God, Yahweh, Jehovah, Jah, a bald, fat, pot-bellied, little man, or aliens. What does matter is whether your faith encourages loving each other and doing good in this world. With more faith and less religion this world would be a better place. The catch 22 is that faith doesn’t just spread by itself. It needs religion to reproduce. And though my faith is Christianity, my religion is Tolerance. Tolerance of faith.

Hello, i just stumbled here!
I found that to be an interesting post. I’d have to say I agree and disagree to a certain extent-
In my humble opinion, it is not “religion” that does the bad. I believe it is the members of the religion that do bad– e.g. the Crusades. I don’t think Christanity was the “source” of Crusades. I mean don’t y’all have that saying “Love thy enemy”? How then can we say that Christanity has brought with it bad stuff?!
I also have to say religion sometimes orders you to be tolerant and to do things you might not have done if it weren’t for religion. Faith often implies that you simply believe in something, but religion shows just how much you believe it. How much you are willing to obey “God” or the alients, or whatever. For example, as a Muslim, we are commanded to give a certain amount of money, called Zakat, to the poor. If I say I share the faith of Islam but never give the Zakat, how am i proving that I am a muslim? I am not! Not only that but though I have faith, I am not tolerating the poor. The truth is faith and religion go hand in hand, and to have more faith but less religion can lead to negative effects…like not giving charity or not feeding the poor or not treating our parents good, etc. *In islam it is a commandment to treat our parents honorably, so that’s why i included that one*
But i agree that often the soul of the religion is forgotten and i think this is the case for all religions. I believe all religions preach love for one another, peace and mercy. The problem begins when people forget these messages and start saying that we have to kill people who aren’t members of our religion.
anyways, thanks for sharing. Hope i haven’t rambled too much. See, my problem is i used to have a blog and one of the issues i discussed was what it meant to be religious so i got real excited when i found this post! Oh, here it is– i just found what i’d written 2 years ago!
http://perfectedfaith.blogspot.com/2005/03/being-religious.html
once again, thanks! and i might be back to visit..
By: Servant of the Compassionate on April 3, 2007
at 9:22 am
Hey,
Thankks for visiting my blog.
I completely agree with you in this post. Tolerance and Freedom are the equintessence of happiness. The world would be a better place without all of these contradictions. I’ll read more!!
By: Edz on April 3, 2007
at 1:06 pm
@Servant of the Compassionate: No. It is religion that is directly responsible for much of the bad. For instance, using your own example, it is a part of the Christian FAITH to “love thy enemy”, but the Bible is filled with contradictions of this faith. The enemies of the Hebrews (God’s people) are not treated with love. They are treated with floods, plagues, wars etc. Their homes are destroyed, their cities are plundered, their families are killed. So it was not hard to justify the Crusades to a Christian in those times because they have had far more violent and unmerciful examples of the wrath of God.
Faith is unambiguous. “Love thy enemy” or “Love thy neighbor” can only be interpreted one way. Religion, on the other hand, is more ambiguous and interpretive.
I am going to read your blog to see if I can get a better perspective on your points though. Thanks for reading!
By: fiyah on April 3, 2007
at 2:26 pm
@Edz: Happy to have visited Edz. Thanks for coming by!
By: fiyah on April 3, 2007
at 2:28 pm
^ My bad- I’ve never read the Bible :S And i was reading your post through the lens of Islam.
To understand the point i was trying to get across is to understand this sura in the Qur’an: (a sura is like a short chapter)
107:1 Hast thou observed him who belieth [b] religion? [/b]
07:2 Then such is the (man) who repulses the orphan (with harshness)
107:3 And encourages not the feeding of the indigent.
107:4 So woe to the worshippers
07:5 Who are neglectful of their prayers,
107:6 Those who (want but) to be seen (of men)
107:7 But refuse (to supply) (even) neighbourly needs
So basically, a religious person in islam is not a person who just prays so that other people will see him. It’s not a person who “lives by the rules” but forgets the orphan or the hungry. And because i believe that the Quran is the Divine Revelation, i see that definition of a religious person (the person who feeds the hungry, and takes care of the orphans) as the solid definition of religion. And therefore, a religious person is a person who takes care of others and helps others.
basically, my problem is I see faith as being so connected to religion that it’s difficult for me to separate the two. It’s faith in God that makes you follow “the religion”, and it is religion that shows you are a member of the faith. I’ll be thinking about what you said.
thanks for taking the time to explain your point! unfortunately, the more i read the more questions i have!
Feel free to visit the blog. but it is quite dead. i haven’t been able to get into it for the past two years :S now i write in a shared community under the name “Servant of the Compassionate”- you can check that out if you want.
i’ll prolly be back again, haha.
By: Servant of the Compassionate on April 3, 2007
at 3:37 pm
^i just realized i was signed in with the wrong blog. the link i was referring to is http://www.islamicink.wordpress.com
By: Servant of the Compassionate on April 3, 2007
at 3:40 pm
@Servant of the Compassionate: I understand your point. But I think that faith can be, and is, independent of religion. Helping your neighbor or fellow man, helping the poor, loving your self are all acts of faith.
Case in point: Atheists do not have a religion. They follow no set doctrine or rules. Yet many of them have faith in social morals and in the aggregate good of mankind. So without religion Atheists still do incredible acts of charity and good because they believe that these actions benefit them and the society they live in.
By: fiyah on April 3, 2007
at 4:36 pm
True! I agree!
By: Servant of the Compassionate on April 4, 2007
at 10:13 am